ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the effect of peer support system on social anxiety and resilience among new graduate nurses. Methods:Totally 36 new graduate nurses entry in 2014 who's Interaction Anxiousness Scale (IAS) score were ＞43 were selected as control group. Totally 39 new graduate nurses entry in 2015 who's IAS score were ＞ 43 were as experimental group. The control group accepted routine standardized training. The experimental group received peer support, which consisted on conduct group intervention and twining intervention (6 months). IAS and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC) were used to investigate the nurses'social anxiety and resilienceat 3 months and 6 months after intervention. The scores were analyzed by using repeated ANVOA Results: Repeated measures analysis of variance of IAS showed that, there were significant differences on the IAS scores for interaction between measure time and group processing (P ＜0.001). The differences between the two groups in the main effects of interaction and time on the total score of CD-Rescan its three dimensions score were all statistically significant (Ps ＜ 0.001). Separate analyses showed that at baseline, there was no significant difference between two groups in all variables (Ps ＞0.05). After 3 months and 6 months of intervention, the IAS scores were lower in the intervention group than in the control group (Ps ＜0.001), the CD-RISC total scores and the three dimensions scores were higher in the intervention group than in the control group (Ps ＜0.05). Conclusion: It suggests that the peer support system could improve the social anxiety and resilience of new graduate nurses.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the feasibility of Six Dimensions Scale (6-D scale) of Nursing Performance used for evaluating the effect of standardized hospital-department training on new graduate nurses.Methods 6-D Scale of Nursing Performance was conducted to evaluate the nursing ability of 216 new graduate nurses (2013) of our hospital pre and post the three-month intervention,including the self-appraisal and appraisals by head nurses.Results The nursing ability was improved significantly after the training.The total score of self-appraisal 6-D scale were significantly higher than that before the training (142.34±19.92 vs 135.81±18.30),in which the subscales scores within the dimensions of leader-ship,critical care,teaching/collaboration,planning/evaluation,interpersonal relations/communication were increased significantly,while the increase of professional development was not significant.Six-D Scale and six subscales scores based on self-appraisal were higher than that based on the head nurses' appraisals.Conclusions The application of 6-D scale is scientific to evaluate the effect of standardized nurse training.We had demonstrated that standardized hospital-department training is of great benefit for new graduates to improve the nursing ability and adapt to the clinical circumstances.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study was done to provide information about issues of clinical competency from the perspective of new graduate nurses and to make suggestions for improving undergraduate education programmes. It was also done to clarify learning experiences between fundamentals of nursing and the other major areas of nursing. METHOD: For this study, 7 new graduates and 8 experienced nurses participated. The data were collected through in-depth interviews and analysed in terms of Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory methodology. RESULT: Core category and main categories, were delineated. Clinical nursing competency was found to be a dynamic process with each participant actively engaged in acquiring problem solving ability in diverse clinical settings. These findings have value in understanding the embedded meaning of clinical nursing competency. CONCLUSION: Therefore, the educational programs reflecting the experience of new nursing staff should be developed.